Abstract Investigation of Chuang Tzu by many

 For the debate between whether the subject right from wrong, to determine the role of right and wrong come to the conclusion of doubt and even denial. But he had seen on this issue with the revelation, for us today on how to solve the different views between the main body, views the debate is still instructive. Warring States Period, philosophers uprisings, hundreds and made, each for different routes Considers the school, argumentative style is very popular, some problems with each other around a heated controversy and debate. Not only that, as a social reality debate activities are also conscious level of consciousness has been reflected, which is reflected in many thinkers from the theoretical debate the issues involved in the process itself to be explored. This paper attempts to examine the epistemological theory of such findings and make some of the shelter. One argument is a kind of opinion exist between the main differences and differences of opinion is the prerequisite for social activities, therefore, Zhuang Zi, Zhuangzi that exists between the views of the main differences and differences of opinion, the reason is that people all have He said: husband deliberately and with the teacher is, who almost alone and without a teacher? (. Chuang Tzu said, yesterday has come. Obviously, he thought the main differences between the views and opinions of all differences are due to So, this subject has Zhuangzi said: the frog who can not be language in the sea, also arrested in the virtual; Even summer insects are not words ice, when Benedict was; song with disabilities who can not be language in the road, tied to teach also. (He believes that Because everyone has a bias from their departure, one of the shelter. Thus, not only have different views between the main differences and differences of opinion, but also because the implementation end of the formation of a self-Yiu dispute about right and wrong, , also a non-infinite also. Understanding of each specific process, not only by various objective factors, but also always been the main experience and knowledge of the past, present feelings, will, and many other conditions. Chuang Tzu's In the process of understanding the role from the characteristics of the neutral [4]. Of course, to Since there exist two different views of the main differences and differences of opinion, Shi Fei, Pandingduicuo Ne? Or, the main debate whether by agreement between the co-sanctioned Truth be know about it? Zhuangzi is through discussion of this issue and further expand his Exchange of ideas between the main body is to be carried out by means of language. To this end, the language Zhuangzi first investigated the role in the debate process. He said: Now that is a carry, and must have made peace? Now that that one of the men, and was almost speechless? One with the words as two, two and one for three. Since the past, the calendar can not be too clever, but where the status of the peace! (Ibid.) the so-called In his view, if This means that the road as the object of knowledge can not use language to express. Therefore, Zhuangzi that argument in the expression of the language used has a mask of the object, the real object itself. If the language can not express the object relationship between subject and object from the perspective of the sheltered nature of the language reveals, then, in the main difference between the opinions and viewpoints on the debate process of the specific right and wrong, the Zhuang Zi that there is another form of language shelter, and this is Xuanying sentence at ease when he said: in a good word do not believe. 'In order to achieve is to have an either, This means that the language of argument in violation of the right thinking, if the basic requirements (formal logic and dialectical logic), will be the subject of mutual communication and understanding between the generation of a masking effect. Second, from the heart between the similarities and differences in the Kennedy White Thus, the text of the vague and fuzzy sense is also the subject of communication and understanding between the generation of a masking effect. View of the He reflected on the different views through the main rooms and views of the debate can distinguish right from wrong, to determine right and wrong skepticism. Concealment of Chuang Tzu's discussion of language [8], related to the language (concepts) and the object relations and language in the main process of mutual communication and understanding the role of two issues. To the former, the concept of knowledge is always required to reflect the object must have one to one relationship between objects, and there is a relatively static state, that Zhuangzi advocates grasp the universe as a whole and its development in terms of the limitations of law,UGG boots cheap, revealing logical thinking in the abstract and concrete, still and motion, the contradiction between the finite and the infinite [9]. However, he denied that this language can grasp the fundamental starting object, the failure to note this limitation by the concept of the concept of the dialectical movement itself, be overcome. As long as the concept of objective and comprehensive use of the flexibility and mobility, people's language, the concept is reflected in the overall universe of perpetual motion and the development of the law. In the latter case, village hand-made ,10]. But there have also been seen in shelter, he main difference between the views and perspectives on the right and wrong literal argument as a purely semantic dispute or disputes, which completely denies the struggle for right and wrong are as indisputable facts side. C If we say that the sheltered nature of language revealing just reflects the non-Zhuangzi resolve the dispute argument holds the possibility of a suspicion, then, in his argument itself can not be demonstrated objectively after determining, from the fundamental denied this possibility. First, from Chuang Tzu Ching (He said: people sleep the wet side of lumbar disease death, Loach ran off? Li Xun wood at the anxious fear, a monkey ran off? Three Shuzhi is now? People eat Chu rear, elk food recommended, worms or maggots willing to take, owl crow addicted rats, the four Shuzhi is taste? That the female ape flat spy, elk and deer cross, Loach and the fish swim. Mao Qiang Li Ji, one of the United States also; see the depth of fish, birds see the fly, elk see the decision at first, the four Shu Zhi Zai Stern thing in the world? Self-view, the tip of righteousness, of right and wrong Tu, Fan natural sheer, I know these debates can be evil! (argument can not be judged objectively. In his view, color, taste and feeling of determines the Thus he reached the people for good and evil, with all differences and disputes Africa can not establish objective criteria to determine, and thus can not be identified. We know the feeling of experience as a knowledge base is always subjective in the form of objects of different ways to grasp the subject always vary, so the feeling has its relative side. In this regard, Chuang Ching undecidability on the point of view is seen. However, he failed to recognize the feeling of the same type of subjects in the same condition can get the same feeling [11]. Moreover, the normal or common sense is always relative to the individual in terms of the different kind of, not between classes there is normal or common sense issue of whether or not [12]. Zhuang people and animals from the difference in the sense of departure,UGG shoes, to demonstrate the experience between people and rational in the sense that the non-communicative understanding, which uses the relationship between class and class to demonstrate the same type of relationship between different individuals, This does not make sense logically. On the other hand, if I disagree with you, there was debate about right and wrong, it can find a third party to be an objective of our argument to determine it? Zhuangzi that this is impossible. He said: I who made being the? So if those are almost the same, and if only the same men, and evil will is the? I almost made the same persons are of both with almost my men, and evil is the will? So egregious if the persons are of me and not only egregious, if I carry on, how can one is the? If I make almost the same persons are of both, if I carry on with the peaceful, energy is the evil? What,UGG boots clearance, then, if I can not be with people all know each other also, and he can be evil? (Ibid.) meaning of this passage is saying, to be judged by a third party, or the same as with your opinions or views of the same with me, or my advice to you is not the same, or with you my opinions the same, but in either case, the third party itself has become a party to the debate process, it is impossible to exist differences of opinion between you and me to make an objective and non-judgment dispute. Therefore, the two of us Who is wrong, you and I do not know he. In this way, because the principal can not start between the different views and perspectives on the right and wrong debate to be determined objectively, Chuang Tzu concluded that: the world is also a non-fruit set yet to know. (Clearly, the Zhuangzi itself from the debate can not objectively determine the start that the main disagreement between the dispute does not exist with non-conclusive, everyone self-righteousness, the true intersubjective rational knowledge can not reach a consensus. Four in the draw of the He believes that argument is unable to determine right and wrong does not mean He said: Even if I argue with the men, and if I win, I do not if it wins, if is also, I am Definitely not evil fruit? If I win, if I win, I was also fruit, and fruit Definitely not evil? It, or also, or have its evil? The club is also, its all Definitely not evil? (However, in his view, as a start in the main argument between the winning side, it reflects the views and opinions are truth and knowledge is also the argument itself can not be judged by the. Moreover, the Zhuangzi is just such a victory, Meanwhile, right and wrong can not be objectively determined by argument, it does not mean that intersubjectivity can not reach a consensus in the debate. In the debate can not be objective about the decision of the second proof, Chuang Tzu once said: , its meaning is you and I hold the same views and his views, which show that in the debate between the main process to reach a consensus. However, he reached consensus that the fact that this consensus can not guarantee the truth of their own, there still exists a right and wrong for consensus to determine the problem, although not Zhuangzi insists that such a determination in the main debate between the an objective to achieve. Since the argument can not guarantee victory in the truth of one's opinion, can not guarantee that the consensus reached between the main body of the truth, then, the argument outside the presence of different views to determine right and wrong could it be? Zhuangzi said: has to be known and then when the husband, they were special to be uncertain as well. (However, because the object itself is volatile, possibility, which also denied the possibility of real rational understanding. Again on the subject this view, as in everyone, real) is consistent, they often , which is Chuang Tzu called In general, the problem of understanding the truth always comes to the discussion of subject and object relations and relations between the two main aspects. The former is the standard for truth in terms of meaning and understanding of the truth that is consistent with the objects reflected in their understanding of the guiding standard is that the practice is successful or effective; the latter is recognized for is the truth , that is, knowledge of truth and for people to accept a consensus to require a certain standard of intersubjectivity based on different views and perspectives of right or wrong to start debate. On the relationship between, on one hand, the main debate between whether the object must be consistent understanding for the decision criteria, but on the other hand, between subject and object also needs to meet or debate between the main body to be determined, two to start the cycle between the understanding of the whole human process. Zi believes that the main argument in itself is not among the different opinions and viewpoints of right and wrong to be a defense of objective, even if the separation of the outcome or the debate reached a consensus. Obviously, he has seen among the limited relationship between the main body is unable to determine the truth of knowledge, so he asked out of the relationship between the principal and return to the main object relationships. However, due to over-emphasize things that he absolutely denied the motion of relatively static, it is also asserted that knowledge can not faithfully reflect the object. Of course, from people all Zhuangzi debate to be determined. Taken together, the people overcome one-sidedness, abstract, gain a more comprehensive understanding of the problem. debate public mind Although Zhuangzi start debate on the subject for the next debate between right and wrong, to determine the role of right and wrong attitude of doubt or even deny [17], but he had seen on this issue with the shelter, how to solve for us today Intersubjectivity different views and perspectives on the controversy, is still instructive. Note :------------------------------------------------ - ------------------------------[ 1] Benwensuoyin [2] and [3] Guo Xiang means Another neighbor Jiangxi Chang interpreted as See Jiangxi Chang: [4] in terms of modern Western philosophy, Gadamer's hermeneutics as the representative of the important work undertaken by schools is one of the Enlightenment is to expose the legitimacy. See Hans-Georg Gadamer: [5] See [6] Chuang understanding of the object as [7] Lin Xiyi shielding The use of language to grasp the main object is present in the twisted ideology and distortion over the object; while the main room to express ideas and exchange views on the language of communication, is fundamentally constrained by ideology. However, this view may not notice because of the language brought the private nature of the sheltered nature of language. See Yu Wu: [9] See Feng Qi: [10] recognize the From the perspective of pragmatics, people are always permeated with the use of language of personal choice and purpose, it's always with the individual within the meaning of the color, in this context, the language has its private nature. The reason why Wittgenstein against private language, is not to deny the individual within the meaning of the language features (such as internal feeling experience),UGG boots, but rather that the expression of private feelings and the correctness of the decision only through language and through debate between the main body can be achieved, but it is definitely not a private process. See Wittgenstein: [11] Xun Zi, Zhuang Zi, where the shelter had been overcome in the. Xun Zi said: class and said. [13] here, Because the two sides to of the yet to be determined. Of course, in his view such a determination is impossible.